Of course, crowdsourcing stood out to me among the list of ways the newsroom can engage with its readers and with the community to involve them in the decision making process. I think the most relevant example for what we are doing is something like the Curious City example. Engaging the public in questions and polls and getting their feedback is vital to make sure this is a community solution and not just something created by a group of journalism students in the classroom without any sort of connection to the public. When it impacts the public, the public needs to be looped in so that the solutions journalism is as comprehensive as possible, not perfect, bur comprehensive.

Co-production was another method that stood out to me because I don’t think you can really get to the heart of the problem with addiction unless you’re listening to people’s stories. If we listen to people’s stories who have been through it, and a large portion of them say, “oh, I’ve tried fill in the blank here, and it didn’t work.” that’s solid information for our stories and project that maybe a solution isn’t working. Then, you could see what that solution looks like in other areas, how it’s different and succeeding or not succeeding to see how Philadelphia could modify it.

Inclusion is also very important because sometimes people who have an addiction are thought of as lesser, but there is no solutions project without talking to those going through it and to those who have gone through it.